Which of the following statements is INCORRECT regarding the well hole stretch?

The correct choice identifies a common misunderstanding regarding the role of the 1st due line in the context of a well hole stretch. The 1st due line is not considered an obstruction; rather, it is a primary operating line that is positioned for immediate use in firefighting operations. Understanding this principle is crucial for ensuring effective fire suppression tactics.

In firefighting scenarios, the positioning and usage of lines must facilitate both attack and safe navigation through the area of operation. Typically, the first line stretched is crucial for addressing the immediate fire threat, allowing firefighters to make a direct firefighting effort. The idea that it would act as an obstruction goes against established protocols for using the first line in an efficient manner.

Knowing that a secondary line must be stretched for safety emphasizes the importance of having backup plans available in any operational setting, particularly where the risk of entrapment or rapid fire spread exists, which can happen in well hole scenarios.

The mention of the 2nd due line and its potential to act as an obstruction should reflect an understanding of tactical positioning, which underscores that only the 1st due line is positioned for proactive firefighting engagement, not as an impediment.

By recognizing the intended role and operational strategies involved in a well hole stretch,